Navattic vs Supademo in 30 seconds
These two are direct competitors, not opposites. Navattic leads with “Make buying easier with demos.” Supademo leads with “Exceptional product demos in minutes, not days.” Both are no-code interactive product-demo platforms aimed at B2B go-to-market teams. Same job, same buyer.
What differs is depth against breadth. Navattic goes deep for revenue teams: its core is a high-fidelity HTML clone of your app, wired into HubSpot, Salesforce and Marketo with advanced analytics, A/B testing and account identification, plus autonomous Agent Demos that run a live demo and answer questions on their own. Supademo spreads wider for less: a genuinely usable free plan, desktop capture on Mac and Windows, video splitting, translation into 50+ languages, an in-app Demo Hub, and free SCORM packaging for an LMS. Its own flagship HTML and sandbox demos, though, jump to Growth at $350/month for five creators.
The buying experience splits them further. Navattic sells on annual commitment only, with a five-seat minimum and a price hidden behind animated digit-reels (third-party trackers report Base near $500/month). Supademo lists $50 a creator and bills monthly. The full table and pricing math are below. There’s also a third option worth a look, since neither tool publishes the same capture as a written doc that lives in a searchable, branded help center on your own domain.
Four differences that decide it
Both capture a web app and turn it into a clickable interactive demo. From there, they diverge on fidelity, price, breadth, and seat model.
Capture & fidelity
HTML-clone fidelity vs a broader capture toolkit
Navattic’s Web Captures clone your app’s real HTML and CSS, so scroll and hover states behave like the live product, and that fidelity is central to every paid tier. Supademo captures screenshots and video by default and reserves its own front-end HTML clone and sandbox demos for Growth at $350/month for five creators. Supademo counters with capture methods Navattic has no answer for: desktop apps on Mac and Windows, video splitting that turns an existing recording into a step-by-step demo, and a Figma plugin. Navattic goes deep on one capture method; Supademo spreads across many.
Pricing model
A listed price vs a quote behind spinning reels
Supademo prints its price. Scale is $50 per creator billed monthly ($38 annually), the free plan is genuinely usable, and you can start with one seat. Navattic doesn’t print a number at all: its pricing page renders animated digit-reels instead of static text, every paid plan is annual commitment only, and the cheapest paid tier carries a five-seat minimum. Third-party trackers report Base around $500/month and Growth around $1,000, but nothing on Navattic’s own page is checkable, and there is no monthly option. For a small team evaluating on a card, that gap in transparency matters as much as the dollars.
Depth vs breadth
Depth for revenue teams vs reach for everyone else
Navattic is built for a sales-led motion. Agent Demos put an autonomous AI in front of the prospect to run a live demo and answer questions, and advanced analytics, A/B testing, account identification and native CRM connectors tie demo engagement to pipeline. Supademo trades some of that depth for reach: free SCORM 1.2 packaging for an LMS, an in-app searchable Demo Hub on the free plan, translation into 50+ languages, and unlimited free view-only seats on Growth. If the demo has to feed a CRM, Navattic wins. If it also has to reach training, support and onboarding, Supademo covers more ground.
Seat model
Who pays for a seat, and how many you must buy
Navattic sells seats in bundles: five on Base, ten on Growth, on an annual commitment, so a three-person team still pays for five. Supademo bills only creators and admins, and view-only collaborators are free, though capped at five on Scale and unlimited only on Growth and above. The free plan gets none. So Supademo is the friendlier shape for a small authoring team with a large read-only audience, while Navattic assumes you are buying for a whole GTM function up front.
Feature-by-feature comparison
Same job, different depth and different gating. Grouped and side by side.
| Capability | Navattic | Supademo |
|---|---|---|
| Capture | ||
| Browser capture | Yes — HTML web capture | Yes — free plan |
| Desktop capture | No — media upload only | Scale plan (Mac & Windows) |
| Turn an existing video into a demo | Not available | Yes — free plan (Video Splitting) |
| High-fidelity HTML / DOM clone | Yes — core Web Captures | Growth plan |
| Sensitive-data redaction | Manual blur, hide, delete | Smart blur (Scale) |
| Import steps from PDF / DOCX | Not available | Not available |
| Interactive demo | ||
| Interactive branching | Yes — interactive demos | Scale plan |
| Chapters | Yes — via Flows | Yes — free plan |
| Dynamic variables | Base plan | Scale plan |
| Sandbox / live-environment demos | Growth plan | Growth plan |
| Autonomous AI demo agent | Agent Demos | AI Demo Agent — Growth add-on |
| AI voiceover | Base plan | Scale plan |
| Voice / avatar cloning | Avatar cloning — Growth | Voice cloning — Growth |
| Multi-language translation | 35 languages — Growth | 50+ languages — Scale |
| Lead-capture forms | Base plan | Scale plan |
| Analytics | Basic free; advanced + A/B — Growth | Scale plan |
| Written output & exports | ||
| Written step-by-step document | PDF Document — ≤60 steps | Copy Steps & Steps view — free plan |
| Downloadable MP4 export | Yes — capped at 15 steps | Free at 1080p watermarked, 4K on Scale |
| PDF export | Yes — Document export | Yes — free plan (PDF & PNG) |
| HTML file export | Not available | Clipboard HTML only, no file |
| Markdown export | Not available | Not available |
| SCORM / LMS package | Not available | Yes — free, no account |
| Bulk export of workspace data | No — per-demo flat files only | Enterprise only |
| Publishing, AI & GTM | ||
| Hosted branded help center (articles) | No help center product | No — Showcase galleries, not an article KB |
| Custom domain | Growth plan | Scale plan |
| In-app guidance widget | In-app demo suggestions — Base | Demo Hub — free plan |
| MCP server (AI tool access) | Reads demo analytics — Base | Edits demos — Scale |
| Native CRM & GTM connectors | HubSpot, Salesforce, Marketo + more — Base | HubSpot, Salesforce, Marketo, Intercom + more — Scale |
| SAML SSO | Growth plan | Enterprise only |
| Pricing | ||
| Free plan | Starter — 1 demo, 1 seat, default theme | Free — 5 demos, Demo Hub, watermarked |
| Entry paid plan (billed monthly) | No monthly plan — annual only | $50/creator — Scale |
| Entry paid plan (billed annually) | ~$500/mo reported — Base, 5-seat min | $38/creator — Scale |
| Tier with HTML & sandbox demos | Growth — 10-seat annual (~$1,000/mo reported) | $350/mo for 5 creators, annual — Growth |
| Seat model | Bundled 5 then 10, annual commitment | Per creator; free view-only seats |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom, from 10 creators |
Both build no-code interactive product demos, and both do it well, so the choice is depth versus breadth and what each plan gates. Navattic wins on HTML-clone fidelity as its core capture, advanced analytics with A/B testing and account identification, native CRM attribution, and autonomous Agent Demos that Supademo prices as a Growth add-on. Supademo wins on price, a usable free plan, desktop capture, video splitting, 50+ language translation, and free SCORM packaging Navattic has no answer for. Navattic sells on annual contracts behind digit-reels with a five-seat minimum; Supademo lists $50 a creator and bills monthly. Both keep demos hosted, and neither publishes a written doc into a branded help center on your own domain — the gap the third option below fills.
Verified against both vendors’ public documentation, July 2026. Navattic’s plan prices are third-party reported figures; its pricing page shows animated digit-reels, not static numbers. Spot something out of date? Tell us and we’ll correct it.
Pricing compared
Every number below states its billing interval, and flags what is reported rather than listed.
~$500/mo
Navattic Base — reported; annual only, 5-seat minimum, no listed price
$50/creator/mo
Supademo Scale billed monthly — $38 billed annually, listed on the page
$19/seat/mo
Guidejar Pro billed monthly — $16 billed annually
Bottom line: Supademo is the cheaper, more transparent way in. Scale is $50 per creator billed monthly ($38 annually), with a genuinely usable free plan below it. Navattic doesn’t print a price at all: annual commitment only, a five-seat minimum on Base, and figures reported near $500/month that you can’t verify on its own page. Depth costs on both sides, though. Supademo’s HTML and sandbox demos jump to $350/month for five creators on Growth, and Navattic holds advanced analytics, A/B testing and custom domains on its ten-seat Growth tier. Five seats of Guidejar Business is $75/month billed monthly, or $59 billed annually, with voiceover and 30+ language translation already on the $19 Pro plan.
Prices as of July 2026. Navattic figures are third-party reported (its page shows no static price) and sold on annual commitment; Supademo bills per creator and its monthly Growth price is not published; Guidejar Business bundles 5 seats.
Where each one genuinely wins
Neither tool is a strictly better version of the other. These are the real, checkable advantages.
Navattic: Agent Demos and a full GTM stack
Navattic’s Agent Demos put an autonomous AI in front of the prospect. It interprets questions, understands intent, and navigates the product live instead of replaying a fixed path. Behind it sits a real revenue engine: native connectors to HubSpot, Salesforce and Marketo from Base, plus advanced analytics, A/B testing and account identification from Growth, all tying demo engagement to pipeline. Supademo’s AI Demo Agent is a Growth add-on priced by usage, and it has no A/B testing. For a sales-led motion, this is Navattic’s territory.
Navattic: high-fidelity HTML capture as the core
Navattic’s Web Captures clone the real page markup, so scroll and hover states behave like the live product, and every element is editable in a no-code editor. That fidelity is central to every paid tier rather than a top-plan upsell. Supademo can clone front-end HTML too, but it holds that and its sandbox demos back to Growth at $350/month for five creators. If a pixel-identical demo is the point and you want it without climbing to the top tier, Navattic gets you there first.
Supademo: free SCORM, video splitting, and a usable free plan
Supademo wraps any demo, or in fact any URL, as a SCORM 1.2 module reporting completion, score and session time back to Cornerstone, Docebo, Moodle or TalentLMS, and the tool is free with no sign-in. Its free plan is a real workspace, not a trial: 5 demos, video splitting to turn a recording into steps, chapters, and an in-app searchable Demo Hub. Navattic has no SCORM at all, and its Starter plan is a single published demo. One caveat: the SCORM package is an iframe wrapper, so it needs live access to Supademo and breaks if you cancel.
Supademo: transparency, breadth, and free viewer seats
Supademo lists its price and bills monthly, where Navattic sells on annual contracts behind digit-reels with a five-seat floor. It also covers more of the job at the entry paid tier: desktop capture on Mac and Windows, translation into 50+ languages, smart-blur redaction, and native connectors including Intercom and Seismic, all on Scale at $38 a creator annually. On Growth, view-only collaborators are unlimited and free. For a team watching budget and reach rather than deep CRM attribution, Supademo is the more forgiving buy.
Which tool is right for you?
Same job, different shape. Honest recommendations based on what your demos have to do.
Choose Navattic if
- You want autonomous Agent Demos that run a live demo and answer a prospect’s questions in real time
- Demo engagement has to flow into HubSpot, Salesforce or Marketo with A/B testing and account identification behind it
- You need a high-fidelity HTML clone of your app, and you want that fidelity without climbing to a top tier
- A sandbox demo a prospect can freely explore, on Growth, is on your requirements list
- A deep sales-led GTM motion across the buyer journey is the core job, and an annual commitment is a fit
Choose Supademo if
- You want a listed price and monthly billing rather than an annual contract behind digit-reels
- An LMS mandate is a hard requirement and you need free SCORM 1.2 packaging
- You record desktop apps, or want to turn an existing video into a demo with video splitting
- You have a large read-only audience and want unlimited free view-only seats on Growth
- You want breadth on a smaller budget: 50+ language translation, an in-app Demo Hub, and a usable free plan
Revenue teams that need depth pick Navattic. Teams that want breadth for less pick Supademo.
They compete for the same job, so the choice comes down to depth versus breadth and which pricing model you can live with: Navattic’s annual-contract, HTML-deep, CRM-wired stack, or Supademo’s listed, monthly, broader toolkit. Both keep the finished demos hosted behind links, embeds and galleries, and neither publishes the same capture as a written doc that lives in a searchable, branded help center on your own domain. That is the gap the third option below fills.
Both of them stop at the same place
Navattic and Supademo build good interactive demos, then keep them locked to links, embeds and hosted galleries. Neither publishes the same capture as a written doc that lives in a searchable, branded help center on your own domain. If your team is happy with that, either tool will serve you. If it isn’t, here’s the third option.
Guidejar
Guidejar takes one capture and publishes it as a Walkthrough View people click through with hotspots and branching, as a written Scroll View doc, or both per guide, then puts the whole library in a searchable branded help center at your own domain. Export any of it as MP4, PDF, HTML or Markdown, so you own the content instead of renting a hosted link. From $19/seat/mo billed monthly.
- One capture, published as a clickable Walkthrough View or a written Scroll View doc, chosen per guide
- Searchable branded help center on your own custom domain, with Ask AI
- Export as MP4, PDF, HTML or Markdown, so you own the content rather than a hosted-only link
- Guidejar MCP builds an SOP library from your docs and answers the team’s questions in ChatGPT or Claude, from the Plus plan
Starting at
$19/mo
per seat, billed monthly ($16 billed annually)
vs Navattic ~$500/mo reportedvs Supademo $50/creator/mo
Try Guidejar freeAI voiceover from $19
Pick a voice on Pro and clone your own on Business, no jump to a $350 or top tier just to narrate
Translate into 30+ languages
From the Pro plan, not a Growth bundle or a Navattic ten-seat tier
A price you can read
$19 a seat listed on the page, billed monthly, no annual lock-in and no seat minimum
Trusted by teams worldwide
How Guidejar stacks up
The rows that actually separate them, with the third column filled in.
| Capability | Navattic | Supademo | Guidejar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interactive demo output | Yes — core Web Captures | Yes — HTML on Growth, screenshots on Scale | Yes — Walkthrough View, Pro plan |
| Front-end HTML clone & sandbox demos | Yes — core capture | Growth plan — $350/mo for 5 creators | Not available |
| Written step-by-step document | PDF Document — static file, ≤60 steps | Copy Steps & Steps view | Yes — Scroll View, a live hosted page, all plans |
| Branded help center on your domain | No help center product | No — Showcase galleries, not an article KB | Yes — Plus plan |
| Export as MP4 / PDF / HTML / Markdown files | PDF, MP4, GIF, text — no HTML or Markdown | PDF, PNG, MP4 — HTML clipboard only | PDF, HTML, Markdown & MP4 files |
| SCORM / LMS package | Not available | Yes — free, no account | Not available |
| AI voiceover entry plan | Base plan | Scale plan — $50/creator/mo | Pro — $19/seat/mo |
| MCP server purpose | Reads demo analytics — Base | Edits demos — Scale | Authors a docs library the team queries — Plus |
| Entry paid price | Annual only, 5-seat min (~$500/mo reported) | $50/creator — Scale | $19/seat — Pro |
Switching to Guidejar
From either tool, most teams finish the move in 1–2 weeks.
- 1
Export what you have
Navattic exports a PDF Document (a screenshot and narration per step, up to 60), an MP4 capped at 15 steps, a GIF, and Copy as Text, with no HTML or Markdown. Supademo exports Copy Steps, PDF or PNG, and MP4 or GIF one demo at a time, and bulk workspace export is Enterprise-only.
- 2
Import into Guidejar
Turn those exported PDFs, videos, or existing screenshots into guides with our importer and AI Video-to-Guide Maker, in just a few clicks and with no all-time import cap. Anything interactive takes a couple of minutes to re-capture with our extension or desktop app.
- 3
Publish it properly
Choose Walkthrough View or Scroll View or both per guide, add AI voiceover, translate into 30+ languages, and put the whole library on a branded help center at your own domain.
“Truly revolutionized the way our team operates daily.”
Eduards Leimanis, Senior WordPress Developer
Frequently asked questions
The questions people actually search before picking one of the two.
Something else on your mind? Talk to us
Neither, in the abstract. They compete for the same job, no-code interactive product demos, so it comes down to depth versus breadth and pricing model. Navattic wins if you need a sales-led motion: HTML-clone fidelity as the core capture, advanced analytics with A/B testing and account identification, native CRM attribution, and autonomous Agent Demos. Supademo wins if you want breadth for less: a listed monthly price, a usable free plan, desktop capture, video splitting, 50+ language translation, and free SCORM packaging. Neither hosts a branded article help center on your own domain, which is where Guidejar comes in.
Supademo lists its price: Scale is $50 per creator billed monthly, or $38 billed annually, and Growth is $350/month for five bundled creators billed annually. Navattic doesn’t print a number. Its pricing page shows animated digit-reels, every paid plan is annual commitment only, and Base carries a five-seat minimum. Third-party trackers report Base near $500/month and Growth near $1,000, but nothing on Navattic’s own page is checkable. Guidejar Pro is $19 a seat monthly ($16 annually), listed on the page.
Supademo, clearly. Its free plan is a real workspace: 5 guided interactive demos, 50 screen and camera recordings, video splitting, chapters, an in-app searchable Demo Hub, and export as link, embed, PDF, PNG or MP4, with the MP4 watermarked at 1080p. Navattic’s free Starter plan is an evaluation, not a workspace: one published demo, one seat, and the default theme only, with custom branding and integrations starting on the paid Base tier. Guidejar’s free plan is 5 guides for 1 user with browser capture, sharing, embedding and PDF export, with a Guidejar watermark until you move to Pro.
Supademo does; Navattic doesn’t. Supademo runs a free browser-based generator that wraps a demo link or iframe in a SCORM 1.2 package for Cornerstone, Docebo, Moodle, TalentLMS, SCORM Cloud, LearnDash, Litmos and Absorb, reporting completion, score and session time, with no plan or sign-in required. Navattic exports only PDF, MP4, GIF and text, so there is no LMS package at all. One caveat on the Supademo side: the SCORM file wraps an iframe rather than bundling the content, so the module needs live access to Supademo and breaks if the account goes away. Guidejar has no SCORM support either.
Supademo does, natively. It ships Mac and Windows desktop apps on the Scale plan that record desktop software, code editors and mobile emulators. Navattic has no native desktop screen recorder: desktop and mobile apps are demoed through Media Captures, meaning uploaded images, GIFs or video rather than a live recording. If capturing a desktop app is on your list, Supademo does it directly. Guidejar includes desktop capture on its Plus plan.
Both do, with real native connectors rather than clipboard tricks. Navattic connects HubSpot, Salesforce, Marketo, Pardot, Segment, Slack and ZoomInfo from Base, and adds A/B testing, account identification and CRM attribution on Growth. Supademo connects HubSpot, Salesforce, Marketo, Intercom, Seismic, Slack, Zapier, Google Analytics and webhooks from Scale, syncing identified viewers back as leads. Navattic goes deeper on pipeline attribution; Supademo offers a broad connector set at a lower entry tier.
Not as an article-based one. Navattic has no hosted help center anywhere in its product lineup, pricing matrix or docs, and shares demos only by link, embed or its JavaScript. Supademo has no article knowledge base either; its nearest surfaces are Showcase Collections, a themeable custom-domain gallery of demos and videos, and the in-app Demo Hub. Both are demo galleries, not a searchable article CMS, and their own docs tell you to embed into a knowledge base you already run. Guidejar publishes the same capture as a written guide inside a branded, searchable help center on your own domain from Plus, with Ask AI answering from your content on Business.
